What's the problem?
Product teams often debate ideas, solutions, and priorities without being clear about what they are actually uncertain about.
Decisions are made based on opinions, intuition, or seniority. Risk is discussed vaguely, if at all. By the time teams learn whether something works, significant delivery effort has already been invested.
This leads to wasted time, sunk costs, and difficult conversations when outcomes do not match expectations.
What’s the solution?
This workshop introduces a hypothesis-driven way of working through two closely connected practices: making assumptions explicit and practising how to test them before building.
Teams learn how to surface the assumptions behind a solution and structure them around different types of product risk. From there, they select one high-risk assumption and work through how to turn it into a clear hypothesis and a concrete experiment with explicit success criteria.
The focus is not on running experiments for their own sake, but on using experimentation deliberately to reduce the risk that matters most before committing delivery effort.
Identifying hidden assumptions behind product ideas and solutions
Understanding different types of product risk
Structuring assumptions and prioritising them based on risk and evidence
Turning assumptions into clear, testable hypotheses
Designing experiments with explicit learning goals and success criteria
Who Is It For?
Product managers and product owners
Cross-functional product teams
Product trios and squads
Teams working on new ideas, features, or strategic bets
For product teams who want to learn before they commit.
How Does It work?
Trusted by Leading Businesses
Whether you're a small startup or a multinational corporation, let us be your trusted advisor on the path to success.











